Dr. Ramani Rheumatology Clinic
Dr. Ramani
Rheumatology Clinic
For GPs and healthcare professionals · Educational tool

Gout Classification Tool for Clinicians

2015 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Gout

A structured way to review recurrent swollen joints, serum urate, MSU crystal evidence and imaging findings using the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Not a standalone diagnosis.

This tool is for clinician education and structured classification support only. The 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria were developed for classification and should not replace clinical judgement, synovial fluid analysis where appropriate, or urgent assessment of possible septic arthritis.

When to use this tool

Suited to structured clinical review

Recurrent acute monoarthritis or oligoarthritis

Especially episodes involving the first MTP, midfoot or ankle.

Suspected gout with unclear features

When features overlap with CPPD, reactive or psoriatic arthritis.

Structured documentation before referral

Capture clinical, laboratory and imaging findings in one record.

Consider urgent assessment for septic arthritis if there is fever, systemic illness, a severe acute hot swollen joint, immunosuppression, a prosthetic joint, or diagnostic uncertainty.

Interactive calculator

Structured classification

Work through the three steps. All scoring runs client-side; no patient data is transmitted or stored.

Step 1

Entry criterion

Has the patient ever had at least one episode of swelling, pain, or tenderness in a peripheral joint or bursa?

Referral support

When a rheumatology opinion may be helpful

Recurrent flares or unclear diagnosis

Young-onset gout

Tophus or erosive disease

Kidney stones or CKD complicating treatment choice

Multiple joints involved

Persistent hyperuricaemia despite treatment

Concern for inflammatory arthritis mimicking gout

Refer or discuss a caseFor GP-to-specialist discussion.
Educational explainer

How the ACR/EULAR gout criteria are structured

  • Step 1 checks whether the patient belongs in the population being scored.

  • Step 2 recognises MSU crystal evidence as sufficient for classification.

  • Step 3 adds weighted clinical, laboratory and imaging features.

  • The threshold is ≥ 8 out of a maximum 23 points.

  • Negative points are applied for very low serum urate and MSU-negative synovial fluid because they reduce the probability of gout.

  • Imaging not performed should score 0, not negative.

References

Source material

  1. Neogi T, et al. 2015 Gout Classification Criteria: an American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:1789–1798.
  2. Neogi T, et al. Arthritis & Rheumatology. 2015;67(10):2557–2568.
  3. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout — for management context only.

This tool is for clinician education and structured classification support only. The 2015 ACR/EULAR criteria were developed for classification and should not replace clinical judgement, synovial fluid analysis where appropriate, or urgent assessment of possible septic arthritis.

More for clinicians

Other doctor guides

Psoriatic Arthritis: When to ReferFRAX® Score: A Practical GuideClinical Approach to Inflammatory Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis: When to ReferComing soon
Suspected SLE: When to ReferComing soon
Gout: Shared Care with GPsComing soon